<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wiley&#8217;s Got me Covered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patandmeg.com/archives/2007/260/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patandmeg.com/archives/2007/260</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.patandmeg.com/archives/2007/260#comment-4483</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patandmeg.com/archives/2007/260#comment-4483</guid>
		<description>Such are the great questions of life...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such are the great questions of life&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klee</title>
		<link>http://www.patandmeg.com/archives/2007/260#comment-4432</link>
		<dc:creator>klee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patandmeg.com/archives/2007/260#comment-4432</guid>
		<description>i think the through should be lower case. but the book looks cool, and i&#039;m pretty sure 99.5/100 people wouldn&#039;t notice whether or not the through were capitalizerd. and even if they did, they would face the same moral conundrum we now impose upon ourselves...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the through should be lower case. but the book looks cool, and i&#8217;m pretty sure 99.5/100 people wouldn&#8217;t notice whether or not the through were capitalizerd. and even if they did, they would face the same moral conundrum we now impose upon ourselves&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.patandmeg.com/archives/2007/260#comment-4429</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 15:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patandmeg.com/archives/2007/260#comment-4429</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope so! Thanks for the comment... the only thing that slightly troubles me is the tilted text for the subtitle. I am also having a raging debate with my better half over whether &quot;through&quot; should be capitalized in title case. Any grammar experts want to comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope so! Thanks for the comment&#8230; the only thing that slightly troubles me is the tilted text for the subtitle. I am also having a raging debate with my better half over whether &#8220;through&#8221; should be capitalized in title case. Any grammar experts want to comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k:ra</title>
		<link>http://www.patandmeg.com/archives/2007/260#comment-4423</link>
		<dc:creator>k:ra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 03:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patandmeg.com/archives/2007/260#comment-4423</guid>
		<description>i dig it.  i&#039;m not familiar with typical business books - but i think this reflects the dynamic nature of the title - and i would imagine - the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dig it.  i&#8217;m not familiar with typical business books &#8211; but i think this reflects the dynamic nature of the title &#8211; and i would imagine &#8211; the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

